As I said
previously,
One of Chomsky's early classics is supposed to be 'American Power and the
New Mandarins'. I managed to get it from my local library. It was re-published
a couple of years ago, but they had the original edition of 1969. Here is
the opening paragraph of 'The Logic of Withdrawal' from April 1968 (the gist
of this
I remembered):
International affairs can be complex, a matter of irreconcilable
interests, each with a claim to legitimacy, and conflicting principles, none
of which can be lightly abandoned. The current Middle East crisis is a typical,
painful example. American interference in the affairs of Vietnam is one of
the rare exceptions to this general rule. The simple fact is that there is
no legitimate interest or principle to justify the use of American military force in Vietnam.
A pretty polished paragraph. Anyway, I haven't read that yet, but I have read 'Objectivity and Liberal Scholarship' (
reproduced here,
without the footnotes). It certainly does seem more closely argued than his
later work. 40 pages or so deal with the Spanish Civil War, centring on a
critique of a book written 'within the consensus'. One small point on attitudes
in Britain:
In 1934 Lloyd George stated that "in a very short time, perhaps
in a year, perhaps in two, the conservative elements in this country will
be looking to Germany as the bulwark against Communism in Europe.... Do not
let us be in a hurry to condemn Germany. We shall be welcoming Germany as
our friend." (Page 100)
The reference to 'conservative elements' makes it seem unlikely that sympathy for Hitler's regime reflected Lloyd George's own views.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home