Bremer spent his 14 months in Baghdad in a tug-of-war with Grand
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani [...]. The Shia leader demanded a provisional government
and an elected constituent assembly to draft a new constitution for Iraq.
Bremer wanted a Governing Council under the CPA, and wanted to select, not
elect, those who would write the national charter.
[...] Sistani’s motives had to do with holding the ring and consolidating
the position of the majority Shia, long under the boot of the Sunnis. But
Sistani was right, insofar as only the legitimacy of an elected constituent
assembly could build bridges from the exiles to local leadership and head
off civil war. Bremer was, in effect, serially vetoed by Sistani, but the
constituent process was held up so long that the insurgency wormed its way
into the vacuum.
I had assumed Bremer did not understand Sistani’s position. Wrong. He did. He just knew better.
'Diplomatic baggage', David Gardner reviewing Paul Bremer's book in the FT Magazine (
subscribers only )
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home